Friday, October 25, 2019
I do like writing about comic book covers. Covers are the first thing that one notices when perusing a magazine rack or the comic book stand. And there are certain elements that never fail to attract the eye: vibrant colors; dramatic composition; screaming lettering; and sex. In these present times of stifling political correctness, sometimes the cover is the only thing justifying the act of buying a comic book. And I intend to keep writing about it here, both about great comic book covers and sexy comic book covers. And eventually, stupid comic book covers. However, in thinking of coming back to this blog, with my dismal record and posting rhythm, I could see it easily becoming dominated by posts about covers, and not about comic book reading. Instead of a weekly update about covers (say, each Wednesday) amidst longer and more substantial posts, it threatened to turn into a substantial text every three or six months and lots of posts about covers. That’s why I decided to create an unpretentious, and merely ancillary blog to post my thoughts about – for now, at least - sexy comic book covers. It doesn’t mean I won’t tackle here some sexy covers in more depth; only that I will use this other blog as a more frequently updated repository of such covers. Maybe one day, it and Gallery of Capes and Bustiers my form a kind of virtual iconotheque for all things of comic book’s aesthetics of erotica (although less pretentious than it sounds). So, dear eventual reader, if that’s also your cup of tea, or if you are just curious or looking for some sexy images of your favorite characters, drop by sometime and leave a comment or two. After all, I’d love to know if you also find sexy what I think is sexy.
Sunday, September 29, 2019
Friday, June 22, 2018
That’s really the question nobody asked, isn’t it? Why do I propose this to be a sexy cover? And I bet the first answer on everybody’s mind is simple and obvious: Boobs, man… duh. And, yes, I’m sure breasts are a prominent part of it (no pun intended). But there is so much more. After all, comic covers with big breasts are a dime a dozen (thankfully), but not all of them are sexy. And, for me at least, this one is.
So, let me try to project some of my subterranean libidinal thoughts into this wonderful cover, maybe misreading it, probably enraging some sensible readers, but – I hope – not twisting what is there. Or, better yet, what isn’t there. For I guess what makes this cover so sexy is precisely what isn’t there.
ALL STAR COMICS #59 sports only the second cover featuring über-chested heroine Power Girl, who had made her first appearance in “All-Star Super-Squad” in the preceding issue. As such it is a full plate for that particular kind of reader (yeah, that’s you, you pussy!) who’s ready to point a vigorous finger at the way such a powerful feminine character is shown as a defenseless damsel in distress right from the start. Even if she is presented as less powerful than Earth-1’s Supergirl and not “as strong as [her] cousin, Superman, but (…) still ten times as strong as any mere man”, she’s clearly the main hero in this two-parter. And those who’ve read the story in #58, and were duly impressed by the feats she packed in the mere four pages she was in (diverting lava flows, causing the earth to tremble from a single foot-stomp) will get the measure of the present menace by seeing her in such dire-straits in the cover at hand. And yet, what dire-straits are those, as nothing even remotely similar takes place inside the book?
One can only conjecture. The one thing one can be certain of is that the enigmatic stone-man’s goal is to take Power Girl. To what end, who can tell? Is it of any significance that she is the only female in the group? That she is the prize to be fought over by all those males? But again, why? The anonymous monster, although clearly male, is markedly sexless.
Copulation cannot be its intent. However, one cannot help but notice that the artist intended Power Girl’s breasts (her only sexual attribute that is not hidden by the colossus’s body) to be level with the monster’s (and Flash’s) groin; it is a non-sexual and almost subliminal contrast between the cold sexlessness of the creature , and the soft, nurturing, warm, living breasts of the powerful girl. It is almost a symbolic depiction of eros and thanatos, eroticism and death. An equation made even more powerful for nothing in the picture (besides the reader’s conviction that she’s the hero – although a new one, and therefore potentially killable) allows us to feel sure that she is still alive.
I’m sure a lot could be made out of her being the only female in the cover, and the only one apparently defenseless. But is she? What about the other invisible element from the cover? Yes, what about you, the reader? Are you not there as well? Aren’t we all there? That’s what the cover’s composition seems to imply with its worm’s-eye-view that places the reader on the floor, fallen, already defeated on the fight with the anonymous colossus. Are you male or female, dear reader? In what side were you fighting? Was the metal colossus your creature, were you its victim? Were you trying, as the Flash was, to save your partner? Or are you about to be saved? Or to be picked up from the floor to be taken along Power Girl to be subjected to ‘a fate worse than death’?
It is a cover that takes you back to that magical time when you’re young enough that you’re still able to immerse yourself as an invisible character in the action; not yet as grown up as to derive all the sexual implications from the situation depicted, but already raging with the inner fire stoked by the subconscious eroticism of the scene.
On a final note, one’s clearly drawn to Power Girl’s breasts. They literally defy gravity:
In true Wally Wood style, they look equally and gorgeously enticing even if you choose to flip the image upside-down. As such, they’re depicted as an erotic note, not a realist one, and that as always been one of the magnets pulling young readers to comic books. In it casts into shame the present attempt to de-eroticize comic-book art, reducing all characters into big shapeless and sexless colossuses.
Friday, July 21, 2017
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Doc Savage is the most well known precursor to modern-day super-heroes, and several authors have already noticed the striking similarities between this Man of Bronze and Siegel & Schuster’s Man of Steel. In fact, Doc Savage stands in the unmarked frontier between pulp fiction and comic books, serving as the prototype to both Superman-like heroes and Batman-type action-detectives, as well as several other tropes. In his crime-fighting and adventurous career, Savage fought criminals, mad scientists and natural monsters, including dinosaurs, and had to survive firefights, crashing planes, sinking subs, fires, explosions, and everything else ‘Kenneth Robeson’ (mostly Lester Dent) could think of. As a result of such extreme adventures and near-misses, the tattered shirt of Doc Savage became a permanent fixture of the character in such diverse media as pulp covers, comic books, graphic novels and films, functioning as a signifier of extreme violence. By means of contrast, injuries were kept to a minimum, mostly never more than a broken lip or a bleeding nose. It was as if the damage suffered by his costume/clothes stood for the intensity of the violence he had to suffer through. Very much as it goes in cartoons (printed or animated) where a character (say Bugs Bunny or Donald Duck) after surviving an explosion, is shown with body blackened and clothes in tatters for a few seconds, before regaining his normal un-disheveled appearance. And such graphic practice was transmitted to comics from its very beginnings.
As I will explore in my next post (the last of the two-year-in-the-making introductory posts to this blog), the superhero costume is very much part and parcel of the hero’s identity and personal definition; something that shouldn’t need further explanation as through the years we’ve seen different characters assume the mantle of iconic super-heroes like Batman, Batgirl, Robin, Captain America, Black Panther and such, implying that besides the particular powers specific to each character, it truly is the costume that makes the hero. Even when, as is the case with Doc Savage, the costume is merely defined by tattered clothes, something equally valid when dealing with Savage’s own female version: his niece Pat Savage.
I’ll admit that what I’m about to posit needs a little more statistical confirmation, but I’ll advance it anyhow in the spirit of impressionistic empiricism: as Mulvey, Dworkin and McKinnon’s unsubstantiated assertions on female objectification and identification of sex with violence drove feminist and extreme-right reaction against female (and even male) exposed flesh, comic book creators started putting forth lame explanations for costumes not to get torn to shreds.
I guess one can set CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS as the representational turning point, with a bevy of costumes being torn as entire earths and heroes were swiped clean, culminating in the torn and bleeding Supergirl dying with her costume in tatters, a confluence of torn costume and injuries, and a vision not soon to be repeated. In his re-imaginings, Byrne would erase the smallest rip from Superman or Wonder Woman’s costumes, with ridiculous explanations of bodily auras that would protect the cloth in contact with the hero’s skin, and generating endless jokes about the incredible number of capes Superman had to replace.
However, as the successive torn capes made clear, even Byrne felt that the costume in tatters was the best way of representing the outcome of physical violence, short of representing the real outcome of violence itself. That is: broken teeth, black-and-blue pulped flesh, broken bones and lots of blood. And, in a way, that’s the way comics went under the neo-victorian code of representation. Intact costumes would demand and bring forth ever more excessive degrees of physical violence. Thus, we went from something like this:
to things like these:
Of course, for the progressive politically-correct noisy minority, violence is always preferable to sex, blood to breasts, death or mutilation to pin-up poses, better to allow them to hypocritically rage over their filled-to-capacity refrigerators. And so, the blood for intact costumes mode of representation became dominant in the major publishers, and affected both male and female characters. Case in point, one of my first pre-adolescent objects of desire: Ms. Marvel (Carol Danvers).
In the seventies, after she emerged from the shadow of Capitain Marvel, Carol Danvers became one of the most popular female superheroes, Marvel’s worthy response to DC’s more tame Supergirl (also a Danvers, and my first ever comic book crush), even if not to ür-Superheroine, Wonder Woman. Hailed as a feminist and progressive icon (something over which not all feminists are in agreement – what else is new?), she nonetheless figured in two cult-covers from her own magazine, where torn costumes are used as effective pointers to the level of menace facing Ms. Marvel (even if not at all faithful to the stories within).
Both covers substitute the torn costume for any bloody signs of violence, which could be confused with topic domestic violence, or battery and assault (and Odin knowns the sexual readings that radical progs, fed with Freudian-mush, already get out of the covers as they are). But, as I stated above, torn costumes had to go, to be replaced by more overtly violent graphics. Now the question is how to represent that level of violence when the one on the receiving end is a super-powered, practically indestructible, super-being, without letting it slide into cartoon caricature? And the answer is: not easily.
Let us consider MS. MARVEL #18-24 (2007-2008), a set of books that comprises the “Puppets” and “Monster and Marvel” story-arcs, both of them easy fodder to varied readings and interpretations. However interesting as they are (and I intend to do a go-over around “Puppets” in the future), it is not the stories per se that I want to tackle now, but the graphic representation of violence, as it escalates towards a maximum of absurdness of which the creators seem not to be aware.
It begins in MS. MARVEL #18, when our heroine is hit point-blank with a grenade that literally explodes on her face without causing the smallest rip on her costume.
If one was to take that as a little bit absurd but still within the bounds of comic book logic, issue 20 brings a quick escalation of power-yield, as Carol once more comes out unscathed from what appears to be a multiple-megaton blast.
Needless to say, despite emerging from the blast amidst a maelstrom of raging fire, her costume remains equally unscathed.
Immediately in the same issue, Ms. Marvel’s quarters aboard a S.H.I.E.L.D. light helicarrier are destroyed in another impressive explosion when hit by an alien missile.
And again, there seems not to be any amount of energy capable of damaging Carol’s costume:
But if you thought that impressive, by issue #21, Carol drops from the outer atmosphere of some alien world… in her pajamas… which miraculously come equally unscathed from the fall and the friction and the heat generated by both.
And there’s no way in hell that repeated references to the “blue stuff inside me” can explain the indestructibility of Carol’s clothes. And it doesn’t stop here, as the creators (writer Brian Reed and penciler Aaron Lopestri) go one over the top and in MISS MARVEL #24 don’t shy away from a good-old nuclear blast at close range in the plain vacuum of space:
It is a spectacular blast that sends the equally indestructible alien creature careening through space, gaining Ms. Marvel – and Earth – some well needed time.
Of course, once again, both Ms. Marvel and her unbelievably resilient costume survive unscathed, even adding another vertiginous fall through the atmosphere.
Both story arcs from which the images above were selected are told with verve, both literary and visual, and one comes out of them with a distinct impression that its authors are aware they are straining the good will of their readers in accepting that a mere piece of cloth could survive such rough handling; not only that, one senses they know their readers will swallow it whole, because not to do it would be politically incorrect. (Surely they wouldn’t believe their story was so brilliant one wouldn’t notice how synthetic fabrics can withstand nuclear explosions and temperatures as close to those of the sun as they can get.) Underlining these impressions, is the fact that in MS. MARVEL #21 the issue of Carol Danvers/Ms.Marvel’s identity is broached in a pertinent way, denying any exceptionality to Carol/Ms.Marvel’s costume: “We’re the same person. I am Ms. Marvel. It’s just a costume”.
Now, one can argue that something in Ms. Marvel’s powers can keep her clothes intact; not only her uniform, but also her pajamas. That somehow, Carol’s invulnerability extends to whatever she’s wearing. But how could this happen?
True, in issue #23, Carol discovers that the alien Cru can “turn her powers off”. Certainly that could explain how the alien’s sting could penetrate through Carol’s costume and Carol’s flesh. Bu then how to explain this in MS. MARVEL #19?
Despite catfighting Tigra (no pun intended) for over two pages (ok, one’s a splash page) and then tackling Silverclaw for two more, Ms. Marvel comes away bleeding from her torn cheek, but with her costume absolutely pristine: again, with costume intact in order not to raise the ire of the righteous left, it is necessary to draw (pun intended) blood. (It is true that in the story, the scratches on Carol’s face are a contrivance used to subdue Ms.Marvel through a toxin in Tigra’s claws, but that does not explain how could the striped ex-Avenger break Ms.Marvel’s atomic-blast-proof skin.)
I think I illustrated – although briefly , and without delving too much on the details of both story arcs, resting on a more visual approach – how I think that the politically correct refraining from present the female characters in ways that could eroticize them through too much exposed flesh , or even equate too uncomfortably eroticism and violence (not that they are mutually exclusive, quite the contrary, but remember this is literature for children – some, quite sophisticated children, but children nonetheless) led to the need to represent more blood and bodily maiming to convey the same degree of danger and menace that yesteryear was conveyed by torn clothes.
So it is that we see Carol Danvers scratched and bleeding, with her back torn by the barbed tendril of Cru, blood running like gravy from her rendered flesh, but with costume proper and primly intact, surviving explosions and nuclear blasts. Carol’s costume in this pages seems like the huge elephant in the middle of the room, that everyone is pretending no to notice. And more than following comic book logic, it calls our attention for nothing as much as those old Disney comics: for kids, you know!
Friday, June 16, 2017
I have never been a great fan of the Flash. I remember reading some of his stories around the time CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS was redrawing the DC Universe, but surely not enough to tell Barry Allen from Wally West at first sight, or to care much about it. And not even FLASHPOINT (2011), which I read from cover to cover, and to which Flash was central, did anything to draw me into the fold of Flash fans. And maybe, just maybe, it was due to this excellent cover by Jack Abel and Rich Buckler that haunts me from the time I was eight or nine.
And I’m sure it was not just any child’s natural fear of the fire that consumes Flash’s flesh, exposing the skull beneath. Nor the realization that superheroes are mortal after all, as much flesh-and-blood as any of us – a scary thought for any kid, used to believe that heroes live forever and cannot be defeated by second rate villains like Black Hand (not that I had even heard of him before). That the cover is gruesome (although brilliantly so) cannot be disputed, but it has remained an object of fascination for me since then. And there are several reasons for that, pilling one over the other, building a graphic edifice of macabre grandeur. Some of those elements are of clear intention; others however, result from fortuitous circumstances, like the darkly morbid humor that results from the juxtaposition of the hero’s sobriquet – the fastest man alive! – with a cover illustration where the Flash is everything but:
Then we have all the macabre trappings of the Flash being devoured by flame to the very bone, his skeleton sticking out from charred flesh and burnt costume, the shadows on the musculature of his torso looking nothing as much as fire-blackened roasted flesh. I guess death as never been rendered so viscerally in a super-hero comic book cover, something I believe can be attributed to Abel’s experience inking horror stories for MISTER MYSTERY (#2 -3 , 1951-52) and JOURNEY INTO UNKNOWN WORLDS. And what can one say of the look – the hopelessly desperate look on Flash’s eyes, still alive in the exposed caves of their orbits? In truth the progression of terror patent in Flash’s eyes in the last three steps of his deflagration tell unheard tales of unexpected horror and despair.
All this is fostered by the cover’s extremely dynamic layout: the reader’s own eyes are subtly dragged from the cover lower right along with the Flash’s curving trajectory, past where it’s intersected by the fatal beam from Black Hand’s gizmo-rod (C), and finally to the hovering villain himself, gloating like a mad-angel of death, in the right upper-corner of the page, there to be sent again along the beam of the rod to where it hits Flash (C), igniting him, a dramatic circularity that subliminally convinces the reader that there is no escape for our hero.
At least, that was the idea that held me in its unbreakable grip for all these years. So much so, that it kept me from reading any more Flash stories. Maybe I should make a short parenthesis in here: it is true that a good cover must be able to stand for itself – and this one surely does that. But in this particular instance, besides being effective from a dramatic and commercial point of view, the cover really had something to do with the story inside. And in that story, “The Day Flash Ran His Last Mile!” (by veteran Cary Bates, penciled by Irving Novick and inked by Frank McLaughlin), the villain Black Hand addresses the reader through the fourth wall, putting forth a clever explanation for his sinister plan:
I must admit that the idea of a “protective aura” shielding Flash from the friction-heat of his speed seemed cleverly logic to my young mind. After all, how would he be able to run at such speeds (even light-speed if one’s to believe his earlier stories) if it wasn’t so? And how clever of Black Hand to devise a way to neutralize said aura. That’s the stuff great adventure is made of. However, the story at hand was a two-parter, to be concluded in THE FLASH #259 the following month. And, thanks to the erratic distribution of Brasilian-printed comic books in Portugal, where I then lived, I never got to read its conclusion (not for a few decades anyway, but it was enough delay for the effect to from the cover to dig deep in my mind). As such, the last I heard of the Flash was the final gloat of Black Hand assuring me that our hero had ran his last mile.
The truth is, I could not see how could the Flash escape such a tragic destiny. And I don’t mean in the story per se. Even at such a tender age one knows that he must have found a solution, or else there would not be any more stories featuring the Flash – and I knew there were (although I kept away from them). But I couldn’t see how could he escape such a tragic destiny forever. If he truly depended on that aura to survive such speeds, how could he run that fast without ever thinking that his aura could fail from one moment to the next? That someone else would discover the same gizmo as Black Hand did. Or, what the heck, what’s to say it wouldn’t just fail by freak accident? And I kept hearing Flash’s voice panting in panicky effort in my brain “I can’t slow down… fast enough…”
I guess it was this existential dread that killed my taste for the Flash. When one relied solely in comic book logic, it was easy to accept the workings of his powers. But as soon as one tries a scientific approach to it (an acquired taste from Julius Schwartz, who was then ruling editor on the book), the unavoidable cold equations take hold… and the universe is indeed a cold and indifferent place. One can run, but one can’t hide. And to err in the side of caution, better not run as fast as the Flash.